header-logo header-logo

The 13th Programme

15 September 2016 / Kathleen Shields
Issue: 7714 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

What should the Law Commission include in its next programme of law reform? Kathleen Shields discusses some options

The Law Commission has a statutory duty to keep “all the law” under review with a view to its development and reform. In order to ensure that our work is as relevant and informed as possible, we embark on wide public consultations when drawing up our programmes of law reform. We are now consulting for our 13th Programme, which will inform our work until 2020. In addition to calling for new ideas, we have identified some areas of law that our experience and discussion with stakeholders suggest may require reform and so could be potential projects for the Programme. Among these potential areas for reform are leasehold law, public inquiries, weddings and surrogacy.

Leaseholds

Leasehold law impacts the lives of millions of people, whether they are landlords or tenants of homes, farms or businesses. In England alone, the most recent statistics show 8.2 million households are rented privately or socially and 4.1 million dwellings are

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll