header-logo header-logo

04 April 2012 / Duncan Ranton , Jane Keir
Issue: 7509 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Deal or no deal?

illustration-converted_5

Duncan Ranton & Jane Keir assess the value of pre-conception agreements

In March, the Court of Appeal gave judgment in the case of A v B and C [2012] EWCA Civ 285, [2012] All ER (D) 119 (Mar). The child at the centre of the litigation was a boy, M, aged two. He was conceived via artificial insemination and his family comprised a gay father and two lesbian mothers. M lived with his mothers, but his parents were unable to agree on the relationship he should have with his father. The father sought what many might describe as the paradigm separated-parent contact model: visiting contact increasing in duration and frequency to staying contact and shared holidays. The mothers opposed staying contact, and wanted any time by M with the father primarily to be in their company. They wanted their child to be brought up in what they described as a 'two parent lesbian nuclear family'.

Pre-conception agreement

The mothersí stance relied heavily on what they believed was the agreement
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll