header-logo header-logo

Expert water matters

07 July 2017 / Richard Hurst
Issue: 7753 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail
nlj_7753_hurst

Richard Hurst provides an expert introduction to the world of construction products & the water industry

During the late 80s the EU considered the use of products used within the building industry and introduced the Construction Products Directive (CPD) (Council Directive 89/106/EEC). The Directive was designed to improve the safety of building design and the products used and to harmonise the national laws of the EU member states to ensure free movement of goods used by the European construction industry.

The CPD covered a wide range of products, ranging from the tiles on the roof to the hinges on the door, the glass of a shower screen or glue for door veneers: it applied to any product ‘produced for incorporation in a permanent manner in construction works, including both buildings and civil engineering works’.

On 1 July 2013, the CPD was withdrawn and replaced by the Construction Products Regulation (305/2011/EU). The objectives of the replacement Regulation remain those of the Directive. Implications for water arise from regulatory issues as well as health and safety. Water

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll