Finger on the trigger

Does triggering Art 50 require a prior Act of Parliament, asks Michael Zander QC

This week marks the beginning of the court case to determine if Parliament’s approval in a statute is required to trigger Art 50 of the Treaty on European Union to officially start the Brexit process.

The Prime Minister, Theresa May, has said she intends to begin the process of withdrawal from the EU by triggering Art 50 of the Treaty on European Union without putting the matter before Parliament. Legal action seeking a declaration that such action would be constitutionally unlawful will be heard this week by the Divisional Court, Lord Thomas, Lord Chief Justice, presiding. The case is listed for argument on 13, 17 and 18 October.

The claimants’ case

The various claimants are private individuals. The so-called lead claimants, represented by Mischcon de Reya, have three QCs led by Lord Pannick. The so-called “People’s Challenge Group”, represented by Bindmans, have two QCs led by Helen Mountfield.

The People’s Challenge team relies on crowdfunding.

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

Finger on the trigger

Issue: 7718 / Categories: Features , Brexit , EU , Constitutional law

Does triggering Art 50 require a prior Act of Parliament, asks Michael Zander QC

This week marks the beginning of the court case to determine if Parliament’s approval in a statute is required to trigger Art 50 of the Treaty on European Union to officially start the Brexit process.