header-logo header-logo

Jackson & fixed costs: the final chapter revisited

04 April 2019 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7835 / Categories: Opinion , Personal injury , Costs
printer mail-detail

Dominic Regan reports on the next steps for Sir Rupert Jackson’s fixed costs finale

At long last we have the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) consultation on fixed costs (‘Extending Fixed Recoverable Costs in Civil Cases: Implementing Sir Rupert Jackson’s proposals’, March 2019). It has taken the department longer to respond than it took Sir Rupert Jackson to investigate and write his comprehensive report. There are two elements of reform. The plan is to fix costs in every fast track claim worth up to £25,000. More radical is the extension of fixed costs to most current multi-track claims between £25,000 and £100,000. An enormous volume of work would be captured.

Various benefits are claimed for the changes. Litigants would have certainty as to their liability if they lose and their recovery if they win—the continuing great uncertainty as to proportionality since 2013 falls away. A formula to determine recoverable costs in fast track is to be found at pages 16 and 17 of the consultation, and for the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll