header-logo header-logo

Lawyers in the public interest

23 August 2016
Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

“Love them or loathe them”, the public interest is dependent on firms such as Public Interest Lawyers (PIL) and Leigh Day to hold the government to account, says Legal Action Group director Steve Hynes.

PIL is due to close on 31 August. The Legal Aid Agency announced earlier this month that it had terminated PIL’s contract because the firm had breached its contractual requirements.

Both PIL and Leigh, Day face accusations of professional misconduct in connection with the Al-Sweady inquiry, which was set up to investigate allegations that British troops killed Iraqi civilians at a check-point near Basra in 2004. The accusations are before the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal and have not been substantiated or refuted.

Writing in NLJ, Hynes notes that both firms have acted for clients in cases where the government was found to have acted illegally and to have held the government to account.

Phil Shiner, partner at PIL, “particularly has history with the Ministry of Defence”, namely the case of Baha Mousa, the Iraqi hotel worker who died during interrogation by British soldiers. Hynes points out that Shiner “doggedly pursued” the case and eventually an inquiry found that Mousa and other prisoners had been subjected to an “appalling episode of serious gratuitous violence”.

Some politicians have lambasted PIL for taking up “spurious” cases. Hynes says, however, that “the problem is sifting the ‘spurious’ from Baha Mousa cases is more difficult than politicians and the many journalists rushing to condemn Shiner might suppose".

Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

North west team expands with senior private client and property hires

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Firm boosts corporate team in Newcastle to support high-growth technology businesses

NEWS
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
Comparators remain the fault line of discrimination law. In this week's NLJ, Anjali Malik, partner at Bellevue Law, and Mukhtiar Singh, barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, review a bumper year of appellate guidance clarifying how tribunals should approach ‘actual’ and ‘evidential’ comparators. A new six-stage framework stresses a simple starting point: identify the treatment first
In cross-border divorces, domicile can decide everything. In NLJ this week, Jennifer Headon, legal director and head of international family, Isobel Inkley, solicitor, and Fiona Collins, trainee solicitor, all at Birketts LLP, unpack a Court of Appeal ruling that re-centres nuance in jurisdiction disputes. The court held that once a domicile of choice is established, the burden lies on the party asserting its loss
Early determination is no longer a novelty in arbitration. In NLJ this week, Gustavo Moser, arbitration specialist lawyer at Lexis+, charts the global embrace of summary disposal powers, now embedded in the Arbitration Act 1996 and mirrored worldwide. Tribunals may swiftly dismiss claims with ‘no real prospect of succeeding’, but only if fairness is preserved
The Ministry of Justice is once again in the dock as access to justice continues to deteriorate. NLJ consultant editor David Greene warns in this week's issue that neither public legal aid nor private litigation funding looks set for a revival in 2026
back-to-top-scroll