Articles by David Corker
Not such a bad idea?
David Corker advocates removing the dishonesty element from the criminal cartel offence
Fit for purpose?
Is civil recovery effective in settling overseas corruption investigations, asks David Corker
Tough competition?
David Corker responds to the criminal cartel offence reform proposals
Time for a serious (SFO) rethink
The importance of Thomas LJ’s sentencing remarks delivered in the Innospec case on 18 March in relation to the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) in particular and corporate criminality in general cannot be underestimated
Money talks
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) announced its “ground breaking global agreement” with British Aerospace (BAe) earlier this month. Under its terms, the company will pay £30m in return for the SFO terminating its prolonged investigation of it for overseas corruption.
Waiting for a verdict
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) recently published its policy on dealing with UK companies suspected of having committed offences involving overseas corruption.
The price of admission
The future of the exclusion on the privilege against self incrimination in relation to foreign proceedings is in doubt. David Corker explains why
May 17, 2012
May 17, 2012
May 17, 2012
May 17, 2012
May 17, 2012
May 17, 2012
NLJ Legal Trends
If a solicitor acts for himself on a claim, my understanding is that he is generally only entitled to litigant in person costs.
What is the deadline for putting a claim form in the post (or DX etc)?
From when should an automatic stay run under CPR 26.4?
Forums
Newsletter
