Child Support Agency (Dudley) v Truman (EAT, 10 December 2008)
Date: 13 February 2009
Authors: Peter Hungerford-Welch
Issue: Vol 159, Issue 7356
Categories: Features, Employment, Practice areas, Discrimination
Peter Hungerford-Welch, associate dean, The City Law School, City University London. W www.city.ac.uk/law
The narrower comparator favoured by the majority in Malcolm v Lewisham LBC [2008] UKHL 43, [2008] 1 AC 1399, in disability-related discrimination claims in the housing context, applies equally in the employment context. The wider comparator used in Clark v TDG Ltd (t/a Novacold Ltd) [1999] 2 All ER 977 should no longer apply (unless and until the legislation is further amended).
Bookmark this article with:
Share this page
February 7, 2012
February 3, 2012
February 2, 2012
February 2, 2012
February 2, 2012
February 2, 2012
NLJ Legal Trends
Will district judges find it of assistance to hear oral argument as to quantum...
In relation to fixed costs in possession claims, does the amount of the entitlement depend...
Where a party fails to appear at a small claims trial without giving the requisite notice...
Forums
Newsletter
