Paragraph 168
Date: 03 March 2010
Issue: Online only
Categories: News
The Court of Appeal has re-instated the substance of paragraph 168 of Lord Neuberger’s judgment, referring to the “dubious record” of Security Service personnel in the Binyam Mohamed case.
Lord Neuberger has clarified his criticism of the Security Service’s record to make clear that he was referring only to the circumstances of the Binyam Mohamed case, and removed a suggestion that the Foreign Office had an interest in the suppression of information.
Eric Metcalfe, JUSTICE’s director of human rights policy, said: “The Master of the Rolls has rightly concluded that his first thoughts were his better thoughts.”
Bookmark this article with:
Share this page
February 7, 2012
February 3, 2012
February 2, 2012
February 2, 2012
February 2, 2012
February 2, 2012
NLJ Legal Trends
What does it take to displace the service deeming provisions of the CPR...
There is a dispute between the parties to an ancillary relief application as to whether...
Why does the practice form for approval of a child settlement (N292) provide for a stay of proceedings...
Forums
Newsletter
