header-logo header-logo

Law digest

Subscribe

Horan v Express Newspapers [2015] EWHC 3550 (QB), [2015] All ER (D) 85 (Dec)

Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Brockenhurst College [2015] EWCA Civ 1196, [2015] All ER (D) 48 (Dec)

Henry Hadaway Organisation Ltd v Pickwick Group Ltd and others [2015] EWHC 3407 (IPEC), [2015] All ER (D) 231 (Nov)

Re Snelling House Ltd;Alford and another v Barton and others [2015] Lexis Citation 278, [2015] All ER (D) 22 (Dec)

Harding trading as MJ Harding Contractors v Paice and another [2015] EWCA Civ 1231, [2015] All ER (D) 11 (Dec)

Harvey v Dunbar Assets plc (No 2) [2015] EWHC 3355 (Ch), [2015] All ER (D) 02 (Dec)

IG Index Ltd v Ehrentreu [2015] EWHC 3390 (QB), [2015] All ER (D) 255 (Nov)

Marks and Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd and another [2015] UKSC 72, [2015] All ER (D) 24 (Dec)

Stretchline Intellectual Property Ltd v H&M Hennes & Mauritz (UK) Ltd [2015] EWHC 3298 (Pat), [2015] All ER (D) 192 (Nov)

Basildon Borough Council v James [2015] EWHC 3365 (Admin), [2015] All ER (D) 249 (Nov)

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll