header-logo header-logo

ABOUT NLJ




New Law Journal, the flagship weekly legal magazine, keeps you up to date with news and change across case law and legislation, as well as changes in procedure across core civil practice areas. Key developments are presented in a digestible format, together with analysis of their implications and practical advice for busy practitioners. 

Subscribers receive 48 issues per year, plus unlimited access to exclusive online and archived content at www. newlawjournal.co.uk

Don’t miss out on…. 

Experts on tap

  • NLJ's updates and comments are written by senior litigation and DR specialists, suppliers, and commentators.
  • NLJ is designed to help practitioners navigate and understand an ever changing and challenging civil justice and post-Brexit legal landscape.
  • Indispensable for professionals who want up-to-date news & analysis on the future of civil litigation.

        Plus:

  • Full access to www.newlawjournal.co.uk 
  • Searchable archive of NLJ news and articles. Ensure that you keep up to date with leading comment, opinion and debate in the civil justice arena. 
  • Keep abreast of recent case law and changes to procedure and practice, and monitor profession updates written by leading suppliers and experts at the forefront of industry developments (practice management, knowledge management, AI, e-disclosure etc).
  • Search for content most relevance to your practice and expertise and, increasingly, your clients' areas of interest, eg post-Brexit implications, costs, case management, disclosure.
  • Keep tabs on our e-newsletters and regular updates online at www.newlawjournal.co.uk plus follow us on Twitter to follow developments, changes and challenges across core practice areas and in the civil justice arena.
  • Plus we cover ADR & AI hot spots; post-Brexit challenges; costs (and the politics of fixed costs); case management, e-disclosure & costs budgeting; insurance trends; litigation funding & trends; online courts; practice management; procedure and practice (regular civil way updates - don't miss a change to the CPR); profession updates; movers and shakers; regulation & professional negligence; rule of law; (access to justice, legal aid, pro bono); and risk & compliance).

Receive 48 issues per year, plus unlimited access to Newlawjournal.co.uk for £710

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Firm grows real estate team with tenth partner hire this financial year

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

NEWS
Early determination is no longer a novelty in arbitration. In NLJ this week, Gustavo Moser, arbitration specialist lawyer at Lexis+, charts the global embrace of summary disposal powers, now embedded in the Arbitration Act 1996 and mirrored worldwide. Tribunals may swiftly dismiss claims with ‘no real prospect of succeeding’, but only if fairness is preserved
The Ministry of Justice is once again in the dock as access to justice continues to deteriorate. NLJ consultant editor David Greene warns in this week's issue that neither public legal aid nor private litigation funding looks set for a revival in 2026
Civil justice lurches onward with characteristic eccentricity. In his latest Civil Way column, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist, surveys a procedural landscape featuring 19-page bundle rules, digital possession claims, and rent laws he labels ‘bonkers’
Can a chief constable be held responsible for disobedient officers? Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth, professor of public law at De Montfort University, examines a Court of Appeal ruling that answers firmly: yes
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
back-to-top-scroll