header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Making Big Tech pay for digital addiction

21 November 2025
Issue: 8140 / Categories: Legal News , Technology , Social Media , Liability , Mental health
printer mail-detail
236032
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ

Platforms, he says, deliberately exploit users’ 'limbic hijacks' to engineer addiction and profit from resulting harms—ranging from depression and body dysmorphia to exploitation.

Drawing analogies with tobacco and gambling, Lambert contends that tortious liability should extend to algorithms designed to manipulate emotion and attention. In detailed examples—including 'Snapchat rape' and online body-image disorders—he explores how legal principles such as the 'creation of danger' doctrine could hold companies accountable.

Citing internal Meta research and whistleblower evidence, Lambert concludes that only litigation can compel Big Tech to redesign its systems: lawyers must make harming users more expensive than changing the algorithm.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

Dorsey & Whitney—Jonathan Christy

Dorsey & Whitney—Jonathan Christy

Dispute resolution team welcomes associate in London

Winckworth Sherwood—Kevin McManamon

Winckworth Sherwood—Kevin McManamon

Special education needs and mental capacity expert joins as partner

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll