header-logo header-logo

21 November 2025
Issue: 8140 / Categories: Legal News , Technology , Social Media , Liability , Mental health
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Making Big Tech pay for digital addiction

236032
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ

Platforms, he says, deliberately exploit users’ 'limbic hijacks' to engineer addiction and profit from resulting harms—ranging from depression and body dysmorphia to exploitation.

Drawing analogies with tobacco and gambling, Lambert contends that tortious liability should extend to algorithms designed to manipulate emotion and attention. In detailed examples—including 'Snapchat rape' and online body-image disorders—he explores how legal principles such as the 'creation of danger' doctrine could hold companies accountable.

Citing internal Meta research and whistleblower evidence, Lambert concludes that only litigation can compel Big Tech to redesign its systems: lawyers must make harming users more expensive than changing the algorithm.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
back-to-top-scroll