header-logo header-logo

21 November 2025
Issue: 8140 / Categories: Legal News , Property , Construction
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Ignore covenants at your peril

236037
Caroline Shea KC and Richard Miller of Falcon Chambers examine the growing judicial focus on 'cynical breach' in restrictive covenant cases, in this week's issue of NLJ

Following Alexander Devine Children’s Cancer Trust v Housing Solutions Ltd, the Upper Tribunal has repeatedly refused to modify covenants where developers built first and applied later. Recent rulings show that deliberate, profit-driven breaches—dubbed 'cynical'—can doom even otherwise valid applications under s 84(1) of the Law of Property Act 1925.

Shea and Miller review later cases, noting how tribunals distinguish naïve or altruistic mistakes from calculated defiance. They urge developers to document reasons for early construction, seek timely injunctions or consents, and avoid relying on self-created breaches to justify modification.

Issue: 8140 / Categories: Legal News , Property , Construction
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll