header-logo header-logo

‘I asked ChatGPT…’

254462
© Getty images

Robert Webster looks at how AI is reshaping family law advice & client expectations

Artificial intelligence (AI) is no longer a novelty in legal practice. Its integration into everyday life has been rapid, and family law is no exception. Increasingly, clients approach solicitors having already consulted generative AI tools to understand their position, predict outcomes, or reduce legal costs. This shift is altering how clients perceive legal services and how solicitors must manage professional relationships, expectations and risk.

Many clients now view AI platforms as an accessible preliminary adviser. Tools such as large language models (LLMs) are frequently used as a first port of call for individuals seeking answers to legal questions. The appeal is obvious. Responses are immediate, confidently expressed and presented in clear language. For clients facing stressful and emotionally charged disputes, this apparent clarity can be reassuring.

However, family law is rarely suited to generalised answers. Outcomes depend on factual nuance, judicial discretion, evidential reliability and the complex interplay between financial, emotional and practical considerations. AI-generated responses

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys senior leadership appointments

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths strengthens London Construction and Engineering practice with two strategic senior hires

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins announces strategic hire to deepen skills base in the social business sector

NEWS
Existing defamation law can respond to AI ‘hallucinations’, but allocating responsibility will prove harder where outputs reach users without human intervention
The High Court has upheld a rare successful serious-irregularity challenge after an arbitrator relied on an implied term neither party had advanced
Thirty years after The Future of Law shook a profession still using fax machines, its central forecast looks increasingly less like prophecy and more like description
More than 100 teams from the legal and financial services sectors competed in five sports at the 51st Law Society RFC Festival of Sport earlier this month
Part-time status need only be an effective cause of less favourable treatment, rather than the sole cause, the Supreme Court has held in Augustine v Data Cars
back-to-top-scroll