header-logo header-logo

‘I asked ChatGPT…’

254462
© Getty images

Robert Webster looks at how AI is reshaping family law advice & client expectations

Artificial intelligence (AI) is no longer a novelty in legal practice. Its integration into everyday life has been rapid, and family law is no exception. Increasingly, clients approach solicitors having already consulted generative AI tools to understand their position, predict outcomes, or reduce legal costs. This shift is altering how clients perceive legal services and how solicitors must manage professional relationships, expectations and risk.

Many clients now view AI platforms as an accessible preliminary adviser. Tools such as large language models (LLMs) are frequently used as a first port of call for individuals seeking answers to legal questions. The appeal is obvious. Responses are immediate, confidently expressed and presented in clear language. For clients facing stressful and emotionally charged disputes, this apparent clarity can be reassuring.

However, family law is rarely suited to generalised answers. Outcomes depend on factual nuance, judicial discretion, evidential reliability and the complex interplay between financial, emotional and practical considerations. AI-generated responses

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll