header-logo header-logo

‘I asked ChatGPT…’

254462
© Getty images

Robert Webster looks at how AI is reshaping family law advice & client expectations

Artificial intelligence (AI) is no longer a novelty in legal practice. Its integration into everyday life has been rapid, and family law is no exception. Increasingly, clients approach solicitors having already consulted generative AI tools to understand their position, predict outcomes, or reduce legal costs. This shift is altering how clients perceive legal services and how solicitors must manage professional relationships, expectations and risk.

Many clients now view AI platforms as an accessible preliminary adviser. Tools such as large language models (LLMs) are frequently used as a first port of call for individuals seeking answers to legal questions. The appeal is obvious. Responses are immediate, confidently expressed and presented in clear language. For clients facing stressful and emotionally charged disputes, this apparent clarity can be reassuring.

However, family law is rarely suited to generalised answers. Outcomes depend on factual nuance, judicial discretion, evidential reliability and the complex interplay between financial, emotional and practical considerations. AI-generated responses

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll