header-logo header-logo

‘Let him have it’: an unsafe conviction

20 September 2024 / Mark Pawlowski
Issue: 8086 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail
189714
Mark Pawlowski reflects on the unsafe conviction of Derek Bentley, hanged for the murder of a policeman in 1952

The film, Let him have it (1991), recreates the circumstances surrounding the murder of a London policeman during an attempted burglary of a warehouse in the early 1950s. Two south London boys, Derek Bentley and Christopher Craig, stood accused of the murder. Bentley was alleged to have called out to his accomplice, Craig, ‘let him have it, Chris’ and, after a while, Craig shot and killed the policeman. Craig, who was 16 years old, was jailed. Bentley, on the other hand, was found guilty of murder and hanged on 28 January 1953. Both the verdict and sentence proved to be highly controversial and eventually the sentence was quashed by the Court of Appeal on 30 July 1998: R v Derek William Bentley (Deceased) [2001] 1 Cr App R 21.

The utilitarian argument

Those who have argued for the death penalty maintain that it has a uniquely deterrent force compared with

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

Morrison Foerster—Jenny Galloway & Luke Rowland

Morrison Foerster—Jenny Galloway & Luke Rowland

Firm grows London practice with two partner promotions

Hogan Lovells—David Hansom

Hogan Lovells—David Hansom

Government contracts and procurement practice expands with London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll