header-logo header-logo

10 June 2022 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7982 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

‘No smoke without fire. . .?’

84225
Nicholas Dobson reports on the burning issue of privacy for those under criminal investigation & freedom of expression for those reporting on it

In general, a person under criminal investigation has, before being charged, a reasonable expectation of privacy in respect of information relating to that investigation.


Proverbs frequently show how little we have changed across the ages. And the sharper the image, the greater its likely longevity. One adage, ‘there’s no smoke without fire’, suggests some probable truth in an accusation or rumour. In 1422, English poet Thomas Hoccleve put this as: ‘Wher no fyr maad is, may no smoke aryse’. Later, in 1576, romance writer George Pettie had it as: ‘There is no smoke but where there is some fire’.

Somewhat more recently, on 15 May 2020 Simon LJ in the Court of Appeal in ZXC v Bloomberg LP [2020] EWCA Civ 611, [2020] All ER (D) 97 (May) remarked that: ‘The law should recognise the human characteristic to assume the worst (that there is no smoke without

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll