header-logo header-logo

‘No smoke without fire. . .?’

10 June 2022 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7982 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail
84225
Nicholas Dobson reports on the burning issue of privacy for those under criminal investigation & freedom of expression for those reporting on it

In general, a person under criminal investigation has, before being charged, a reasonable expectation of privacy in respect of information relating to that investigation.


Proverbs frequently show how little we have changed across the ages. And the sharper the image, the greater its likely longevity. One adage, ‘there’s no smoke without fire’, suggests some probable truth in an accusation or rumour. In 1422, English poet Thomas Hoccleve put this as: ‘Wher no fyr maad is, may no smoke aryse’. Later, in 1576, romance writer George Pettie had it as: ‘There is no smoke but where there is some fire’.

Somewhat more recently, on 15 May 2020 Simon LJ in the Court of Appeal in ZXC v Bloomberg LP [2020] EWCA Civ 611, [2020] All ER (D) 97 (May) remarked that: ‘The law should recognise the human characteristic to assume the worst (that there is no smoke without

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll