header-logo header-logo

2010 bid concerns

05 February 2009
Issue: 7355 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services
printer mail-detail

Legal aid

Legal Services Commission (LSC) plans to create a more “integrated” civil legal aid service could result in less choice for consumers, practitioners are warning.

The LSC wants to increase the number of firms offering a range of civil legal aid services so that fewer clients are referred back and forth between suppliers. Its plans are set out in its consultation on the new procurement model for the civil legal aid contract, Civil Bid Round for 2010 Contracts. However, practitioners say supply shortages could occur as a result.

David Emmerson, chair of Resolution’s legal aid committee, said: “We agree broadly with the basis of the Commission’s proposals on both holistic services and family firms undertaking a range of work. However, the Commission needs to be sure that in areas where there is insufficient supply that their requirements are sufficiently flexible to ensure quality suppliers can successfully bid.”

Richard Miller, head of the Law Society’s Legal Aid team, says: “While we understand the potential benefits to clients of providing a higher level of ‘integrated services’, the reality is that the proposals are likely to do more harm than good.”

Issue: 7355 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll