header-logo header-logo

21st century problems

17 June 2016 / Peter Thompson KC
Issue: 7703 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail
nlj_7703_thompson

Look to the data protection principles to solve hacking & trolling complaints, says Peter Thompson QC

It has been the biggest innovation in the law of tort since trespass on the case. But it is never used. Well, hardly ever, although it offers a legal remedy for so many of our 21st century problems, such as hacking, trolling, identity theft, vulgar abuse, injurious falsehood and unauthorised surveillance.

I mean, of course, s 13 of the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA 1998). In case you need reminding, that provides that an individual who suffers damage by reason of any contravention by a data controller of any of the requirements of DPA 1998 is entitled to compensation from the data controller for that damage. As for the requirements of DPA 1998, the data controller of “personal data” (data concerning an individual by which the individual can be identified) is required by s 4 to comply with the data protection principles in the processing of all personal data. Big businesses are data controllers in a big way. So are

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll