header-logo header-logo

17 June 2016 / Peter Thompson KC
Issue: 7703 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

21st century problems

nlj_7703_thompson

Look to the data protection principles to solve hacking & trolling complaints, says Peter Thompson QC

It has been the biggest innovation in the law of tort since trespass on the case. But it is never used. Well, hardly ever, although it offers a legal remedy for so many of our 21st century problems, such as hacking, trolling, identity theft, vulgar abuse, injurious falsehood and unauthorised surveillance.

I mean, of course, s 13 of the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA 1998). In case you need reminding, that provides that an individual who suffers damage by reason of any contravention by a data controller of any of the requirements of DPA 1998 is entitled to compensation from the data controller for that damage. As for the requirements of DPA 1998, the data controller of “personal data” (data concerning an individual by which the individual can be identified) is required by s 4 to comply with the data protection principles in the processing of all personal data. Big businesses are data controllers in a big way. So are

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll