header-logo header-logo

24-hour retirement

16 October 2008 / Roderick Ramage
Issue: 7341 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

The NHS pension scheme makes a mountain out of flexible retirement, says Roderick Ramage

The principle of the 24-hour retirement rule is that a member of the NHS pension scheme may receive retirement benefits from the scheme and return to work if two conditions are satisfied:

retirement from NHS work for not less than 24 hours; and

that the retired member does not work for more than 16 hours per week in the first month after the pension becomes payable.

The application of this rule is described in a letter from the NHS Pensions Agency to all NHS chief executives, payroll managers et al, written in August 2006 to clarify “the rules regarding qualifying for retirement”. The letter deals with officer scheme members, practitioner scheme members and ill health pension benefits. Although not stated expressly it is probable that it came into effect on 6 April 2006. This date, known as A-Day is the day on which Pt 4 of the Finance Act 2004 (FA 2004) came into force and wholly reformed the basis on which

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll