header-logo header-logo

16 October 2008 / Roderick Ramage
Issue: 7341 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

24-hour retirement

The NHS pension scheme makes a mountain out of flexible retirement, says Roderick Ramage

The principle of the 24-hour retirement rule is that a member of the NHS pension scheme may receive retirement benefits from the scheme and return to work if two conditions are satisfied:

retirement from NHS work for not less than 24 hours; and

that the retired member does not work for more than 16 hours per week in the first month after the pension becomes payable.

The application of this rule is described in a letter from the NHS Pensions Agency to all NHS chief executives, payroll managers et al, written in August 2006 to clarify “the rules regarding qualifying for retirement”. The letter deals with officer scheme members, practitioner scheme members and ill health pension benefits. Although not stated expressly it is probable that it came into effect on 6 April 2006. This date, known as A-Day is the day on which Pt 4 of the Finance Act 2004 (FA 2004) came into force and wholly reformed the basis on which

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
Can a meticulously maintained spreadsheet turn a couple’s informal financial arrangements into legally enforceable obligations? 
back-to-top-scroll