header-logo header-logo

06 December 2024 / James Lister
Issue: 8097 / Categories: Opinion , Health , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Assisted dying: 330 for; 275 against

200375
Bringing the assisted dying Bill into force will involve navigating a legal & ethical minefield, says James Lister

On 29 November 2024, the House of Commons voted in favour of the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, a watershed moment in the discussion in England & Wales around the evolution of that most morally and legally difficult subject of whether a person should be allowed to ask for assistance to end their own life.

This outcome is unsurprising and reflects the desire to create a permissive regime that has the potential to ease the pain and suffering of an unfortunate few. Rather than opening the door to a slippery slope, this is a niche, closely controlled opportunity to support those who might need and want help in ending their lives to have the ability to do so. But what questions remain unanswered, and can we draw any international comparisons?

The proposals in Kim Leadbeater MP’s draft Bill bear some striking resemblances to the Bill proposed in the House

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll