header-logo header-logo

06 December 2024 / James Lister
Issue: 8097 / Categories: Opinion , Health , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Assisted dying: 330 for; 275 against

200375
Bringing the assisted dying Bill into force will involve navigating a legal & ethical minefield, says James Lister

On 29 November 2024, the House of Commons voted in favour of the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, a watershed moment in the discussion in England & Wales around the evolution of that most morally and legally difficult subject of whether a person should be allowed to ask for assistance to end their own life.

This outcome is unsurprising and reflects the desire to create a permissive regime that has the potential to ease the pain and suffering of an unfortunate few. Rather than opening the door to a slippery slope, this is a niche, closely controlled opportunity to support those who might need and want help in ending their lives to have the ability to do so. But what questions remain unanswered, and can we draw any international comparisons?

The proposals in Kim Leadbeater MP’s draft Bill bear some striking resemblances to the Bill proposed in the House

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll