header-logo header-logo

Assisted dying: 330 for; 275 against

06 December 2024 / James Lister
Issue: 8097 / Categories: Opinion , Health , Human rights
printer mail-detail
200375
Bringing the assisted dying Bill into force will involve navigating a legal & ethical minefield, says James Lister

On 29 November 2024, the House of Commons voted in favour of the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, a watershed moment in the discussion in England & Wales around the evolution of that most morally and legally difficult subject of whether a person should be allowed to ask for assistance to end their own life.

This outcome is unsurprising and reflects the desire to create a permissive regime that has the potential to ease the pain and suffering of an unfortunate few. Rather than opening the door to a slippery slope, this is a niche, closely controlled opportunity to support those who might need and want help in ending their lives to have the ability to do so. But what questions remain unanswered, and can we draw any international comparisons?

The proposals in Kim Leadbeater MP’s draft Bill bear some striking resemblances to the Bill proposed in the House

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll