header-logo header-logo

17 June 2026
Categories: Legal News , Equality , Family , ADR , Mediation
printer mail-detail

4PB announces 2026 winner of memorial essay prize

© Evelyn North Photography
4PB chambers has announced the 2026 winner of its Alan Inglis Memorial Essay Prize, now in its third year

The competition was set up in memory of family barrister and advocate Alan Inglis, who died in August 2023. It commemorates Inglis’ longstanding commitment to advancing LGBTQ+ rights and his unique contribution to the legal profession as the only family barrister qualified to practise in both England and Wales and Scotland.

This year's essay question was: 'What role can NCDR play in resolving LGBT+ family law disputes?'. 

The winning essay was written by Charlotte Perry (pictured), a legal education specialist with the Justice Centre Hong Kong. Originally from Chesterfield, North Derbyshire, Perry is a former secondary school teacher and graduate of SOAS who completed the University of London International Programmes distance learning LLB course in 2024. She is a recipient of the Honourable Society of Gray’s Inn BTC Scholarship (Goldie Award) 2024 and a University of London Student Research Fellow 2024.

As the competition's winner, Perry will receive a £500 monetary prize and an invitation for a mini-pupillage.

Read Perry's winning essay here.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
Can a meticulously maintained spreadsheet turn a couple’s informal financial arrangements into legally enforceable obligations? 
back-to-top-scroll