header-logo header-logo

A constructive construction project?

31 January 2025 / Imogen Dodds , Jamie Sutherland
Issue: 8102 / Categories: Features , Construction , Property , Limitation , International
printer mail-detail
205948
Imogen Dodds & Jamie Sutherland consider a Hong Kong case that gives clarity on limitation periods in constructive trust claims
  • In Hui Chun Ping v Hui Kau Mo [2024] HKCFA 32, Lord Hoffmann confirmed in the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal that claims against category 2 constructive trustees (ie, people whose trusteeship arises from a wrongful act) do not fall within the equivalent provision of s 21(1)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980.
  • Accordingly, claims by a beneficiary to recover trust property from a category 2 constructive trustee are not excluded from the application of limitation periods.
  • Instead, such claims are subject to the usual six-year limitation period.

The Court of Final Appeal of Hong Kong published its decision in Hui Chun Ping v Hui Kau Mo [2024] HKCFA 32 on 23 December 2024, with the lead judgment given by Lord Hoffmann. It is of interest to those practising in England and Wales, as the statutory provision considered by the court is in materially identical

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll