header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
31 January 2025 / Imogen Dodds , Jamie Sutherland
Issue: 8102 / Categories: Features , Construction , Property , Limitation , International
printer mail-detail

A constructive construction project?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
205948
Imogen Dodds & Jamie Sutherland consider a Hong Kong case that gives clarity on limitation periods in constructive trust claims
  • In Hui Chun Ping v Hui Kau Mo [2024] HKCFA 32, Lord Hoffmann confirmed in the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal that claims against category 2 constructive trustees (ie, people whose trusteeship arises from a wrongful act) do not fall within the equivalent provision of s 21(1)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980.
  • Accordingly, claims by a beneficiary to recover trust property from a category 2 constructive trustee are not excluded from the application of limitation periods.
  • Instead, such claims are subject to the usual six-year limitation period.

The Court of Final Appeal of Hong Kong published its decision in Hui Chun Ping v Hui Kau Mo [2024] HKCFA 32 on 23 December 2024, with the lead judgment given by Lord Hoffmann. It is of interest to those practising in England and Wales, as the statutory provision considered by the court is in materially identical

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

McCarthy Denning—Harvey Knight & Martin Sandler

McCarthy Denning—Harvey Knight & Martin Sandler

Financial services and regulatory offering boosted by partner hires

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When ‘milk’ really means milk
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
NLJ this week: Civil practice with claws & caution
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
NLJ this week: Stealing virtual gold?
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
NLJ this week: Don’t let your LPA gather dust
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
NLJ this week: Short lets & sharp covenants
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll