header-logo header-logo

28 May 2021 / Keith Wilding
Issue: 7934 / Categories: Features , Mental health , Community care
printer mail-detail

Mental health: a different, better way ahead?

49949
Proposals to make mental health services more person-centred are highly welcome, but Keith Wilding fears they may founder without sufficient financial investment
  • Recognition of the need for resources.
  • Advocating an ambitious programme of change to bring services into the 21st century.
  • Increasing patient choice and autonomy.
  • Using the least restriction possible.
  • Changing the ethos of service delivery.

An independent review of the Mental Health Act 1983 (MHA 1983) was commissioned in October 2017 and undertaken by Professor Sir Simon Wessely, a past president of the Royal College of Psychiatrists, and his team. The final report is entitled Modernising the Mental Health Act increasing choice, reducing compulsion and was published in December 2018. This government consultation document is the long-awaited response, Reforming the Mental Health Act, published in January 2021. In Pt 3 the White Paper responds to each of the 154 recommendations in the Wessely review separately. It is important to note at the outset that the proposals require substantial future financial

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll