header-logo header-logo

Mental health: a different, better way ahead?

28 May 2021 / Keith Wilding
Issue: 7934 / Categories: Features , Mental health , Community care
printer mail-detail
49949
Proposals to make mental health services more person-centred are highly welcome, but Keith Wilding fears they may founder without sufficient financial investment
  • Recognition of the need for resources.
  • Advocating an ambitious programme of change to bring services into the 21st century.
  • Increasing patient choice and autonomy.
  • Using the least restriction possible.
  • Changing the ethos of service delivery.

An independent review of the Mental Health Act 1983 (MHA 1983) was commissioned in October 2017 and undertaken by Professor Sir Simon Wessely, a past president of the Royal College of Psychiatrists, and his team. The final report is entitled Modernising the Mental Health Act increasing choice, reducing compulsion and was published in December 2018. This government consultation document is the long-awaited response, Reforming the Mental Health Act, published in January 2021. In Pt 3 the White Paper responds to each of the 154 recommendations in the Wessely review separately. It is important to note at the outset that the proposals require substantial future financial

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll