header-logo header-logo

A different future for family law?

03 December 2021 / David Burrows
Issue: 7959 / Categories: Features , Family , Profession , In Court
printer mail-detail
66014
Open justice is the default position for all civil proceedings & should be high on any family courts reformer’s list, says David Burrows
  • Sir Andrew McFarlane’s 16-page review.
  • Open justice and the law.
  • Anonymity of children and parties.
  • Release of documents and publicity of court materials.

Sir Andrew McFarlane, president of the Family Division, trails his recent report on transparency in the family courts on the basis of his concern that a journalist can sit in on a family court but cannot always report what is observed. This is ‘not sustainable’ he says.

Over two years Sir Andrew’s concerns have been mulling over, and have been the subject of a variety of consultation. He says he has ‘reached the conclusion that there needs to be a major shift in culture and process to increase transparency’ in the family courts. His review, he says, ‘has focused upon the dual goals of enhancing public confidence in the family justice system, whilst at the same time maintaining the anonymity

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll