header-logo header-logo

24 July 2026 / Kirsty Brimelow KC
Issue: 8171 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal , Child law
printer mail-detail

A fairer age for criminal responsibility

255691
© The Bar Council
Brimelow KC: ‘The law should not stand still’
The measure of a justice system lies not in how early it punishes children but in how wisely it protects their future, writes Kirsty Brimelow KC

Justice begins by recognising that children experience the world differently—and the law should too. In May, the government published its youth justice system reform and delivery plan, ‘Cutting youth crime, changing young lives’. The plan committed to ‘carefully consider’ the Bar Council’s work reviewing ‘whether the age of criminal responsibility remains appropriate’.

As the new chair of the Bar Council this year, I set out a series of priorities for 2026, including a focus on children in the justice system. I established a working group with experts from the fields of neuroscience, law, psychiatry and psychology. Collectively we reviewed the current age threshold and concluded that 10 years’ old is too young. We recommend that the minimum age of criminal responsibility (MACR) should change from age 10 to 14.

Ancient principles

The responsibility for determining the minimum age at which a child

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise expands London secondaries team with addition of Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law welcomes ex-Irwin Mitchell team to launch Hestia Private Client

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Heavyweight patent litigator will bolster Carpmaels Ransford’s rapidly growing Litigation team as firm marks its 250th anniversary

NEWS
Lawyers have welcomed plans to create specialist rape and serious sex offences courtrooms at every Crown Court
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
back-to-top-scroll