header-logo header-logo

24 July 2026 / Kirsty Brimelow KC
Issue: 8171 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal , Child law
printer mail-detail

A fairer age for criminal responsibility

255691
© The Bar Council
Brimelow KC: ‘The law should not stand still’
The measure of a justice system lies not in how early it punishes children but in how wisely it protects their future, writes Kirsty Brimelow KC

Justice begins by recognising that children experience the world differently—and the law should too. In May, the government published its youth justice system reform and delivery plan, ‘Cutting youth crime, changing young lives’. The plan committed to ‘carefully consider’ the Bar Council’s work reviewing ‘whether the age of criminal responsibility remains appropriate’.

As the new chair of the Bar Council this year, I set out a series of priorities for 2026, including a focus on children in the justice system. I established a working group with experts from the fields of neuroscience, law, psychiatry and psychology. Collectively we reviewed the current age threshold and concluded that 10 years’ old is too young. We recommend that the minimum age of criminal responsibility (MACR) should change from age 10 to 14.

Ancient principles

The responsibility for determining the minimum age at which a child

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DAC Beachcroft—Clare Dewar

DAC Beachcroft—Clare Dewar

DAC Beachcroft strengthens Scottish real estate capabilitywith partner appointment

Womble Bond Dickinson—Brendan Ryan

Womble Bond Dickinson—Brendan Ryan

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints Brendan Ryan as partner in Public Law Projects team

Parklane Plowden Chambers—five appointments

Parklane Plowden Chambers—five appointments

Parklane Plowden Chambers welcomes five new barristers

NEWS
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
Police powers targeting concealed identities at protests come with procedural conditions that could determine whether prosecutions succeed
back-to-top-scroll