header-logo header-logo

International arbitration: a hybrid future?

18 June 2020 / Anthony Connerty
Issue: 7891 / Categories: Features , ADR , Covid-19
printer mail-detail
Anthony Connerty assesses the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on international arbitration
  • COVID-19 and its current influence on international arbitration.
  • COVID-19 and the future of international arbitration: the hybrid hearing?

The impact of the pandemic on litigation in the civil and criminal courts in England and Wales has been considerable: those courts are geared for face-to-face hearings. That is especially so in the case of criminal trials before a jury. The need for those courts to switch to remote hearings represents a major change. The effect of coronavirus on international arbitration is likely to have less impact: international arbitration is already familiar with remote hearings in one form or another.

The author’s experience as counsel and arbitrator in the conduct of an international arbitration—whether institutional or ad hoc—is that various procedures are already used which may be labelled ‘remote’.

With parties in different countries and in different time zones the procedure at an arbitration is likely to involve matters such as:

  • the use of telephone conferences: for
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll