header-logo header-logo

International arbitration: a hybrid future?

18 June 2020 / Anthony Connerty
Issue: 7891 / Categories: Features , ADR , Covid-19
printer mail-detail
Anthony Connerty assesses the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on international arbitration
  • COVID-19 and its current influence on international arbitration.
  • COVID-19 and the future of international arbitration: the hybrid hearing?

The impact of the pandemic on litigation in the civil and criminal courts in England and Wales has been considerable: those courts are geared for face-to-face hearings. That is especially so in the case of criminal trials before a jury. The need for those courts to switch to remote hearings represents a major change. The effect of coronavirus on international arbitration is likely to have less impact: international arbitration is already familiar with remote hearings in one form or another.

The author’s experience as counsel and arbitrator in the conduct of an international arbitration—whether institutional or ad hoc—is that various procedures are already used which may be labelled ‘remote’.

With parties in different countries and in different time zones the procedure at an arbitration is likely to involve matters such as:

  • the use of telephone conferences: for
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll