header-logo header-logo

18 June 2020 / Anthony Connerty
Issue: 7891 / Categories: Features , ADR , Covid-19
printer mail-detail

International arbitration: a hybrid future?

Anthony Connerty assesses the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on international arbitration
  • COVID-19 and its current influence on international arbitration.
  • COVID-19 and the future of international arbitration: the hybrid hearing?

The impact of the pandemic on litigation in the civil and criminal courts in England and Wales has been considerable: those courts are geared for face-to-face hearings. That is especially so in the case of criminal trials before a jury. The need for those courts to switch to remote hearings represents a major change. The effect of coronavirus on international arbitration is likely to have less impact: international arbitration is already familiar with remote hearings in one form or another.

The author’s experience as counsel and arbitrator in the conduct of an international arbitration—whether institutional or ad hoc—is that various procedures are already used which may be labelled ‘remote’.

With parties in different countries and in different time zones the procedure at an arbitration is likely to involve matters such as:

  • the use of telephone conferences: for
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll