header-logo header-logo

21 February 2019 / Martin Burns
Issue: 7829 / Categories: Features , Profession , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

A model expert

Martin Burns reflects on the ever-changing role & duties of the expert witness

  • Being a technical expert does not necessarily make someone a good expert witness.

The use of experts to inform legal proceedings is nothing new. The ancient Romans, for example, occasionally employed handwriting specialists and land surveyors as legal experts. However, the systematic use of expert witnesses, and the routine admissibility of their testimony and subject matter expertise, really began to develop properly from around 250 years ago.

The model we recognise today whereby an expert witness is permitted to testify in court and provide opinion evidence can be traced to 1772. In the case of Folkes v Chadd, a civil engineer by the name of John Smeaton was instructed to provide testimony about technical issues concerning the development of a harbour at Wells-Next-The-Sea in Norfolk. The court’s decision in 1772, to use Smeaton’s opinion evidence to inform its substantive decision, was a starting point for a continuous expansion of expert testimony in court and other proceedings.

For

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll