header-logo header-logo

26 September 2019 / Edwina Bones
Issue: 7857 / Categories: Features , Competition , Media
printer mail-detail

A right royal rumble

Edwina Bones explains why you must be careful with your competitions if you want to be Queen or King of the Castle

Competitions or prize draws can be a very attractive way to raise money, or to sell unusual properties. However, when you launch a competition, how much thought goes into the terms that apply or the laws governing these promotions? The rules surrounding competitions can often be forgotten about, but a recent ruling by the UK's advertising watchdog reminds us how important they are.

The £5 castle

Mrs DeVere offered a Scottish castle (pictured) as a raffle prize in an online competition. Entries cost £5 per ticket and were advertised as ‘less than the price of a pizza’. She valued the property at between £1.5m–£2.7m.

However, when she did not sell enough tickets she awarded the winners cash prizes. These were at the value of £65,000, £7,000 and £5,000. She was investigated by the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) when one of the entrants complained, claiming that the competition had not

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
Could an online LLM in Commercial and Technology Law expand your career options?
The controversial Courts and Tribunals Bill has passed its second reading by 304 votes to 203, despite concerted opposition from the legal profession
The presumption of parental involvement is to be abolished, the Lord Chancellor David Lammy has confirmed
A highly experienced chartered legal executive has been prevented from representing her client in financial remedies proceedings, in a case that highlights the continued fallout from Mazur
Plans to commandeer 50%-75% of the interest on lawyers’ client accounts to fund the justice system overlook the cost and administrative burden of this on small and medium law firms, CILEX has warned
back-to-top-scroll