header-logo header-logo

26 September 2019 / Edwina Bones
Issue: 7857 / Categories: Features , Competition , Media
printer mail-detail

A right royal rumble

Edwina Bones explains why you must be careful with your competitions if you want to be Queen or King of the Castle

Competitions or prize draws can be a very attractive way to raise money, or to sell unusual properties. However, when you launch a competition, how much thought goes into the terms that apply or the laws governing these promotions? The rules surrounding competitions can often be forgotten about, but a recent ruling by the UK's advertising watchdog reminds us how important they are.

The £5 castle

Mrs DeVere offered a Scottish castle (pictured) as a raffle prize in an online competition. Entries cost £5 per ticket and were advertised as ‘less than the price of a pizza’. She valued the property at between £1.5m–£2.7m.

However, when she did not sell enough tickets she awarded the winners cash prizes. These were at the value of £65,000, £7,000 and £5,000. She was investigated by the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) when one of the entrants complained, claiming that the competition had not

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll