header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
09 June 2023 / David Burrows
Issue: 8028 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

A stitch in time in the family courts (Pt 1)

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
125552
How can the family courts achieve hearings ‘within a reasonable time’? David Burrows sets out some practical ideas for speeding up cases
  • Judicial time well spent in case management could save appreciable proportions of hearing time.
  • Some cases now listed in the High Court could be dealt with by lower tier judges, and by assessors as judges.
  • There are arguably some areas of decision-making where professional lawyers (as judges) are not essential to fair disposal of cases.

Article 6.1 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) states that ‘everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time’. In April, the Law Society expressed its concern at continuing delays in family proceedings and the inadequacy of legal aid.

This article addresses the last few words of the quote from Art 6.1, ‘within a reasonable time’. It aims to provide practical, completely realistic (with administrative will) ideas for speeding up family cases. And this can be done without spending

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
NLJ this week: Diamond rings and broken promises

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

NLJ this week: FCA enforcement embraces ‘quality over quantity’
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has become ‘a very different organisation’ under its new enforcement leadership, writes James Tyler, of counsel at Peters & Peters LLP, in the latest issue of NLJ
NLJ this week: When post-breach events rewrite damages claims
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
King sets out Starmer’s legislative agenda
The government will aim to pass legislation banning leasehold for new flats and capping ground rent, introducing non-compulsory digital ID and creating a ‘duty of candour’ for public servants (also known as the Hillsborough law) in the next Parliament
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll