header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

A stitch in time in the family courts (Pt 1)

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
09 June 2023 / David Burrows
Issue: 8028 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail
125552
How can the family courts achieve hearings ‘within a reasonable time’? David Burrows sets out some practical ideas for speeding up cases
  • Judicial time well spent in case management could save appreciable proportions of hearing time.
  • Some cases now listed in the High Court could be dealt with by lower tier judges, and by assessors as judges.
  • There are arguably some areas of decision-making where professional lawyers (as judges) are not essential to fair disposal of cases.

Article 6.1 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) states that ‘everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time’. In April, the Law Society expressed its concern at continuing delays in family proceedings and the inadequacy of legal aid.

This article addresses the last few words of the quote from Art 6.1, ‘within a reasonable time’. It aims to provide practical, completely realistic (with administrative will) ideas for speeding up family cases. And this can be done without spending

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Mourant—Stephen Alexander

Mourant—Stephen Alexander

Jersey litigation lead appointed to global STEP Council

mfg Solicitors—nine trainees

mfg Solicitors—nine trainees

Firm invests in future talent with new training cohort

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Traders’ convictions quashed in Libor shock
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
NLJ this week: Trans pool player loses discrimination fight
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Small firms call for tech clarity as AI looms
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Pro bono power without the red tape
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Fraud claims climb as courts brace for AI threats
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll