header-logo header-logo

Access to justice worse than 1949

26 September 2014
Issue: 7623 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Bar Council report confirms “devastating” impact of LASPO on legal aid

Legal aid cuts have had a “devastating” effect on access to justice, a major report has concluded.

A Bar Council report, LASPO: One Year On, into the impact of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) found that fewer people have access to free legal representation now than in 1949, when legal aid was introduced. LASPO removed legal aid from swathes of civil law in April 2013.

Nearly 90% of respondents who work with family courts and 70% of respondents from civil courts reported an increase in litigants in person. The report, based on interviews and a survey of more than 700 legal practitioners, found that this causes a chain reaction of cases not being properly presented, leading to extra delays, pressures and costs on the court system, as well as litigants damaging their case by not making points or speaking up when they should. More people are relying on pro bono services, with a 50% increase in applications to the Bar Pro Bono Unit in the first year.

Nicholas Lavender QC, chair of the Bar Council, says: “Much of what we feared about LASPO has come to pass. Individuals dealing with life-changing legal issues are denied fair access to justice if they cannot afford it.

“A rise in self-representation is clogging the courts and creating additional costs to the tax payer, free frontline legal advisors are creaking under the strain, pro bono lawyers cannot cope with the demand, and the safety net the government created for providing legal aid in ‘exceptional cases’ is not fit for purpose.”

The report also highlights that Ministry of Justice predictions that 5,000 to 7,000 applications for “exceptional circumstances” funding would be made, and the majority granted, have failed to pass. Only 1,519 applications were made in the first year, and a mere 57 granted.

The Bar Council called on the government to collect more data on litigants in person, simplify court documents, work with voluntary agencies to provide extra support and extend exceptional funding criteria to include cases of “significant wider public interest” and of “overwhelming importance to the client”.

Issue: 7623 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
Artificial intelligence may be revolutionising the law, but its misuse could wreck cases and careers, warns Clare Arthurs of Penningtons Manches Cooper in this week's NLJ
Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Rylatt and Robyn Laye of Anthony Gold Solicitors examine recent international relocation cases where allegations of domestic abuse shaped outcomes
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
back-to-top-scroll