header-logo header-logo

10 July 2015 / Elizabeth Milbourn
Issue: 7660 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

An accidental patient?

nlj_7660_milbourn

Do health professionals owe a duty to people who are not their patients? Elizabeth Milbourn reports

In ABC v St Georges Healthcare NHS Trust and others [2015] EWHC 1394 (QB), [2015] All ER (D) 172 (May), the court ruled that the defendants’ duty of care could not extend to a patient’s daughter. To quote the judge, Mr Justice Nicol, “the essential facts of this claim are short and tragic”. The claimant’s father was convicted of manslaughter for killing the claimant’s mother. The father was subsequently sentenced to a Hospital Order under the Mental Health Act 1983. He was detained by one of the first defendant’s clinics, run by the second defendant. While detained he also saw a social worker who was employed by the third defendant.

Patient confidentiality

In 2009, the father was diagnosed with Huntington’s Disease. A child has a 50% chance of developing Huntington’s Disease, if one of their parents has it. The various health professionals employed by the defendants sought the father’s permission to tell his daughter, who was pregnant at

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll