header-logo header-logo

10 July 2015 / Elizabeth Milbourn
Issue: 7660 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

An accidental patient?

nlj_7660_milbourn

Do health professionals owe a duty to people who are not their patients? Elizabeth Milbourn reports

In ABC v St Georges Healthcare NHS Trust and others [2015] EWHC 1394 (QB), [2015] All ER (D) 172 (May), the court ruled that the defendants’ duty of care could not extend to a patient’s daughter. To quote the judge, Mr Justice Nicol, “the essential facts of this claim are short and tragic”. The claimant’s father was convicted of manslaughter for killing the claimant’s mother. The father was subsequently sentenced to a Hospital Order under the Mental Health Act 1983. He was detained by one of the first defendant’s clinics, run by the second defendant. While detained he also saw a social worker who was employed by the third defendant.

Patient confidentiality

In 2009, the father was diagnosed with Huntington’s Disease. A child has a 50% chance of developing Huntington’s Disease, if one of their parents has it. The various health professionals employed by the defendants sought the father’s permission to tell his daughter, who was pregnant at

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll