header-logo header-logo

An accidental patient?

10 July 2015 / Elizabeth Milbourn
Issue: 7660 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail
nlj_7660_milbourn

Do health professionals owe a duty to people who are not their patients? Elizabeth Milbourn reports

In ABC v St Georges Healthcare NHS Trust and others [2015] EWHC 1394 (QB), [2015] All ER (D) 172 (May), the court ruled that the defendants’ duty of care could not extend to a patient’s daughter. To quote the judge, Mr Justice Nicol, “the essential facts of this claim are short and tragic”. The claimant’s father was convicted of manslaughter for killing the claimant’s mother. The father was subsequently sentenced to a Hospital Order under the Mental Health Act 1983. He was detained by one of the first defendant’s clinics, run by the second defendant. While detained he also saw a social worker who was employed by the third defendant.

Patient confidentiality

In 2009, the father was diagnosed with Huntington’s Disease. A child has a 50% chance of developing Huntington’s Disease, if one of their parents has it. The various health professionals employed by the defendants sought the father’s permission to tell his daughter, who was pregnant at

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll