header-logo header-logo

An accidental patient?

10 July 2015 / Elizabeth Milbourn
Issue: 7660 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail
nlj_7660_milbourn

Do health professionals owe a duty to people who are not their patients? Elizabeth Milbourn reports

In ABC v St Georges Healthcare NHS Trust and others [2015] EWHC 1394 (QB), [2015] All ER (D) 172 (May), the court ruled that the defendants’ duty of care could not extend to a patient’s daughter. To quote the judge, Mr Justice Nicol, “the essential facts of this claim are short and tragic”. The claimant’s father was convicted of manslaughter for killing the claimant’s mother. The father was subsequently sentenced to a Hospital Order under the Mental Health Act 1983. He was detained by one of the first defendant’s clinics, run by the second defendant. While detained he also saw a social worker who was employed by the third defendant.

Patient confidentiality

In 2009, the father was diagnosed with Huntington’s Disease. A child has a 50% chance of developing Huntington’s Disease, if one of their parents has it. The various health professionals employed by the defendants sought the father’s permission to tell his daughter, who was pregnant at

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll