header-logo header-logo

Act heralds new era in care

04 October 2007
Issue: 7291 / Categories: Legal News , Mental health
printer mail-detail

News

The way decisions will be made for mentally incapable people change radically from this week with the introduction of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA 2005).

MCA 2005—which will introduce measures such as lasting powers of attorney, living wills, and allow people to give views on their future health and medical treatment, should they not be able to do so in the future—has been broadly welcomed by lawyers. But some concerns remain.

David Hewitt, a partner at Hempsons, says the fact that anyone who intervenes in the life of an incapable person will have the duty to do so in their best interests might prove a significant protection against abuse, as will the new statutory principles and code of practice. 

“Lasting powers of attorney, however, are a bit of a concern, not least because they will make it possible for decisions about an incapable person to be taken be someone else. It might be difficult to know the perspective of a decision-maker, or even whether they have ulterior motives of their own. The change is likely to increase the possibilities for debate and even dispute between families and professional care teams.”

He says that although MCA 2005 can be used to restrict an incapable person’s liberty, it can’t be used to deprive them of liberty.
“The trick will be deciding where the line falls in a particular case. Eventually, the Act will be amended so as to permit actual deprivations of liberty, but that won’t be until next autumn. That’s when the real fun is likely to begin,” he adds.

Saimo Chahal, a partner at Bindman & Partners, says some of MCA 2005’s provisions are bound to lead to court battles.
“A valid advance decision to refuse life sustaining treatment must be obeyed by health care professionals while the Act expressly forbids euthanasia—a deliberate intervention with the express aim of ending life. There will be many instances where these two aims will clash leaving plenty of scope for arguments before the courts,” she says.

She adds that the provisions on independent mental capacity advocates are welcome in providing an independent voice for those who lack capacity, but only if proper funding is made available to implement these provisions.

Issue: 7291 / Categories: Legal News , Mental health
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Writing in NLJ this week, Thomas Rothwell and Kavish Shah of Falcon Chambers unpack the surprise inclusion of a ban on upwards-only rent reviews in the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll