header-logo header-logo

11 July 2013
Issue: 7568 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Adjudication—Award—Enforcement

Westshield Civil Engineering Ltd and another company v Buckingham Group Contracting Ltd [2013] EWHC 1825 (TCC), [2013] All ER (D) 10 (Jul)

Queen’s Bench Division, Technology and Construction Court, Aikenhead J, 28 Jun 2013

Proceedings in England and Wales are started (or synonymously “commenced”) when those proceedings are issued by the court; not when they are served on the other party.

Vincent Moran QC (instructed by Pannone LLP) for the claimants. Serena Cheng (instructed by Trowers & Hamlin LLP) for the defendant

The defendant company (Buckingham) was the main contractor engaged in 2011 to construct a new studio for the well-known television “soap”, Coronation Street in Salford. The second claimant, WL, undertook subcontracted works. The sub-contractor was named as the first claimant (WCE), a dormant company owned by one or more of the same shareholders as WL.

The sub-contract works were finished in July 2012. Clause 14(6) of the sub-contract provided that: “Should either party be dissatisfied with the decision of the adjudicator that party may within 28 days of the adjudicator’s decision

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Heather Gibson

Freeths—Heather Gibson

Freeths strengthens national tax team with Heather Gibson appointment

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise expands London secondaries team with addition of Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law welcomes ex-Irwin Mitchell team to launch Hestia Private Client

NEWS
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
A client cannot use a costs assessment to investigate whether their solicitor received commission on an after-the-event (ATE) insurance premium, the Court of Appeal has held
Law firms cannot be compelled to disclose documents protected by unwaived legal professional privilege (LPP) during misconduct investigations, the High Court has clarified
Solicitors have urged regulators not to impose unnecessary cost and complexity on third-party litigation funding
International demand for UK legal services is surging, with exports at record levels, according to Law Society research
back-to-top-scroll