header-logo header-logo

22 June 2017
Issue: 7751 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

Admin below

Q In respect of administration actions, the county court has jurisdiction where the amount or value of the estate does not exceed the county court’s equity limit which is currently £350,000. On the standard grant of probate, both the “gross” and the “net “value of the estate is given. Which of these is to be used for calculating the amount or value of the estate for the purposes of the county court’s equity limit?”

A The position is not straightforward. Jurisdiction can depend on the value of the estate both when the claim is commenced and when the court is subsequently dealing with it. The grant may simply give a ‘not exceeding’ figure and that or any specific value will be taken as at the date of death. Nevertheless, we consider that the net value shown in the grant be taken as the starting point for the purpose of jurisdiction with a transfer up being necessary if it transpires that the net value has exceeded £350,000.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carpmaels & Ransford—Kevin Cordina

Carpmaels & Ransford—Kevin Cordina

Firm adds former Simmons Simmons patent head to engineering and tech team

ACTAPS—Sally Goodger

ACTAPS—Sally Goodger

Freeths strengthens its voice in national disputes with ACTAPS committee appointment

Pillsbury—Matthew Sperry

Pillsbury—Matthew Sperry

Pillsbury expands private client and family office platform with Cadwalader partner hire

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll