header-logo header-logo

Admin below

22 June 2017
Issue: 7751 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

Q In respect of administration actions, the county court has jurisdiction where the amount or value of the estate does not exceed the county court’s equity limit which is currently £350,000. On the standard grant of probate, both the “gross” and the “net “value of the estate is given. Which of these is to be used for calculating the amount or value of the estate for the purposes of the county court’s equity limit?”

A The position is not straightforward. Jurisdiction can depend on the value of the estate both when the claim is commenced and when the court is subsequently dealing with it. The grant may simply give a ‘not exceeding’ figure and that or any specific value will be taken as at the date of death. Nevertheless, we consider that the net value shown in the grant be taken as the starting point for the purpose of jurisdiction with a transfer up being necessary if it transpires that the net value has exceeded £350,000.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
back-to-top-scroll