header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
07 June 2012
Categories: Legislation
printer mail-detail

Adoption Agencies (Panel and Consequential Amendments) Regulations 2012 (SI 2012/1410)

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

The Adoption Agencies Regulations 2005, SI 2005/389, is amended for cases where the adoption agency is considering whether the child ought to be placed for adoption.
Commencement date
1 September 2012

Legislation Affected

SI 2005/392, SI 2005/389 amended


Summary

Background

The aim of the adoption reform programme is to:

  • increase the number of adoptions of looked after children when it is in the child’s best interests; and
  • encourage more people to come forward to adopt, tackle delay and remove real or perceived barriers.

What’s Changing?

The Adoption Agencies Regulations 2005, SI 2005/389, is amended for cases where the adoption agency is considering whether the child ought to be placed for adoption. If they decide that the child should be placed, the agency must receive an application in writing and obtain information from a prospective adopter to assess their suitability to adopt a child. If the criteria is met, the local authority must then apply to the court for a placement

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll