header-logo header-logo

Adoption Agencies (Panel and Consequential Amendments) Regulations 2012 (SI 2012/1410)

07 June 2012
Categories: Legislation
printer mail-detail

The Adoption Agencies Regulations 2005, SI 2005/389, is amended for cases where the adoption agency is considering whether the child ought to be placed for adoption.

Commencement date
1 September 2012

Legislation Affected

SI 2005/392, SI 2005/389 amended


Summary

Background

The aim of the adoption reform programme is to:

  • increase the number of adoptions of looked after children when it is in the child’s best interests; and
  • encourage more people to come forward to adopt, tackle delay and remove real or perceived barriers.

What’s Changing?

The Adoption Agencies Regulations 2005, SI 2005/389, is amended for cases where the adoption agency is considering whether the child ought to be placed for adoption. If they decide that the child should be placed, the agency must receive an application in writing and obtain information from a prospective adopter to assess their suitability to adopt a child. If the criteria is met, the local authority must then apply to the court for a placement

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll