header-logo header-logo

Adoption agency victory

28 March 2010
Issue: 7410 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

A Catholic child adoption agency has won a High Court case that could allow it to lawfully discriminate against same-sex couples.

A Catholic child adoption agency has won a High Court case that could allow it to lawfully discriminate against same-sex couples.

In Catholic Care v the Charity Commission and the Equality and Human Rights Commission [2010] EWHC 520 (Ch), Catholic Care sought an exemption from the Sexual Orientation Regulations 2007, which make it unlawful to discriminate on the ground of sexual orientation in the provision of goods or services.

The agency, which has achieved success in finding parents for “hard to place” children, argued that it operates within the tenets of the Roman Catholic Church, including a strong belief in the sanctity of marriage. It provides services to couples only if they are married. It claimed it had found it impracticable to find a way round the regulations and continue operating.
Delivering judgment, Mr Justice Briggs said the “submission that differential treatment which is not founded on the special needs either of the proposed adoptive parents or the children, or upon any other class of justification recognised by the developing jurisprudence on Art 14, must be discriminatory commands real respect.

 [However] the very unusual predicament of Catholic Care, its status as an adoption agency of last resort for ‘hard to place’ children and the arguably pre-eminent needs of those children who will otherwise be left unadopted may constitute a very special and unusual case for recognition under Art 14.”

 

Issue: 7410 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll