header-logo header-logo

Adoption agency victory

28 March 2010
Issue: 7410 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

A Catholic child adoption agency has won a High Court case that could allow it to lawfully discriminate against same-sex couples.

A Catholic child adoption agency has won a High Court case that could allow it to lawfully discriminate against same-sex couples.

In Catholic Care v the Charity Commission and the Equality and Human Rights Commission [2010] EWHC 520 (Ch), Catholic Care sought an exemption from the Sexual Orientation Regulations 2007, which make it unlawful to discriminate on the ground of sexual orientation in the provision of goods or services.

The agency, which has achieved success in finding parents for “hard to place” children, argued that it operates within the tenets of the Roman Catholic Church, including a strong belief in the sanctity of marriage. It provides services to couples only if they are married. It claimed it had found it impracticable to find a way round the regulations and continue operating.
Delivering judgment, Mr Justice Briggs said the “submission that differential treatment which is not founded on the special needs either of the proposed adoptive parents or the children, or upon any other class of justification recognised by the developing jurisprudence on Art 14, must be discriminatory commands real respect.

 [However] the very unusual predicament of Catholic Care, its status as an adoption agency of last resort for ‘hard to place’ children and the arguably pre-eminent needs of those children who will otherwise be left unadopted may constitute a very special and unusual case for recognition under Art 14.”

 

Issue: 7410 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll