header-logo header-logo

Adoption without borders?

25 September 2009 / Ruth Cabeza
Issue: 7386 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Ruth Cabeza considers the changing landscape for international adoptions

The case of Re A (A Child) [2009] EWCA Civ 41, 3 All ER 479 considered how the law can facilitate a child’s adoption, by prospective adopters who live outside this jurisdiction.

Readers who are familiar with domestic adoption will know that an adoption order can only be made in this country to prospective adoptive parents domiciled in this jurisdiction and who have lived for not less than a year at the time of issue. That is a problem for people who live elsewhere, but who wish to adopt a child living here. Such people need to adopt the child in their own country.

However, to protect children from slavery and child trafficking and to promote their welfare, English law does not permit the casual movement of children, out of this country for the purpose of adoption overseas. Section 84 of the Adoption and Children Act 2002 (ACA 2002) does, however, facilitate the lawful removal of children from the UK for the purpose of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The House of Lords has set up a select committee to examine assisted dying, which will delay the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
back-to-top-scroll