header-logo header-logo

Adoption without borders?

25 September 2009 / Ruth Cabeza
Issue: 7386 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Ruth Cabeza considers the changing landscape for international adoptions

The case of Re A (A Child) [2009] EWCA Civ 41, 3 All ER 479 considered how the law can facilitate a child’s adoption, by prospective adopters who live outside this jurisdiction.

Readers who are familiar with domestic adoption will know that an adoption order can only be made in this country to prospective adoptive parents domiciled in this jurisdiction and who have lived for not less than a year at the time of issue. That is a problem for people who live elsewhere, but who wish to adopt a child living here. Such people need to adopt the child in their own country.

However, to protect children from slavery and child trafficking and to promote their welfare, English law does not permit the casual movement of children, out of this country for the purpose of adoption overseas. Section 84 of the Adoption and Children Act 2002 (ACA 2002) does, however, facilitate the lawful removal of children from the UK for the purpose of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Firm strengthens catastrophic injury capability with partner promotions

DWF—Dean Gormley

DWF—Dean Gormley

Finance and restructuring team offering expands in Manchester with partner hire

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Firm announces appointment of head of remortgage

NEWS
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
back-to-top-scroll