header-logo header-logo

Adverse consequences

03 February 2012 / Stephen Hockman
Issue: 7499 / Categories: Opinion , Environment
printer mail-detail

Stephen Hockman QC condemns government manoeuvres to restrict affordable access to environmental justice

The importance of an appropriate legal framework for the protection of the environment should, in this day and age, need no emphasis. There are two aspects of this framework. The first is the system of public law under which decisions by public authorities that, unlawfully or irrationally, fail to protect our environment can be challenged by way of judicial review. The ability to bring such judicial review challenges has been held by the Judicial Committee of the House of Lords (the predecessor of the Supreme Court) as essential to secure compliance with our obligations under the European Convention of Human Rights. The UK is also a party to the so-called AARHUS Convention, which requires that such challenges can be brought without prohibitive expense, a duty which, according to a recent decision of the AARHUS compliance committee, the UK is already failing to meet.

Of equal importance is the ability of a citizen or a group of citizens to bring private law proceedings (usually

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll