header-logo header-logo

03 February 2012 / Stephen Hockman
Issue: 7499 / Categories: Opinion , Environment
printer mail-detail

Adverse consequences

Stephen Hockman QC condemns government manoeuvres to restrict affordable access to environmental justice

The importance of an appropriate legal framework for the protection of the environment should, in this day and age, need no emphasis. There are two aspects of this framework. The first is the system of public law under which decisions by public authorities that, unlawfully or irrationally, fail to protect our environment can be challenged by way of judicial review. The ability to bring such judicial review challenges has been held by the Judicial Committee of the House of Lords (the predecessor of the Supreme Court) as essential to secure compliance with our obligations under the European Convention of Human Rights. The UK is also a party to the so-called AARHUS Convention, which requires that such challenges can be brought without prohibitive expense, a duty which, according to a recent decision of the AARHUS compliance committee, the UK is already failing to meet.

Of equal importance is the ability of a citizen or a group of citizens to bring private law proceedings (usually

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll