header-logo header-logo

Affirmative cyber cover

27 October 2021
Issue: 7954 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Cyber
printer mail-detail
An extra clause addressing affirmative cyber cover is to be added to the minimum terms and conditions for professional indemnity insurance, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has announced

The clause has been submitted to the Legal Services Board for final approval. If agreed, it will be in place for insurance renewals from early 2022 onwards.

It means insurance policies will explicitly state whether cover for cybercrime is available and specify what losses fall within scope for a potential claim. The cover is for client and third-party protection.

Losses to the law firm (first-party losses) are not covered, except for certain costs of investigating and defending a claim. However, firms can purchase a separate cyber policy for other risks.

Paul Philip, SRA chief executive, said: ‘Law firms handle large amounts of client money and sensitive information, and that makes them an attractive target to cybercriminals.

‘The clause on cyber losses provides real clarity for consumers, law firms and insurers about client and third-party protection in the event of cyber-attack, without changing the amount of cover specified by the minimum terms and conditions.’

The SRA published its 2021-22 business plan last week, following a consultation exercise in which more than 8,000 people voiced their opinions. Key areas of work for the SRA in the coming year, starting in November, include delivering the new Solicitors Qualifying Examination, building partnerships in lawtech, increasing its focus on anti-money laundering, developing its presence in Wales, and researching factors underpinning the attainment gap and over-representation of black and ethnic minority solicitors within enforcement processes.

Responding to feedback to its consultation, the SRA has also added: explaining its approach to assuring advocacy standards, capturing information on its legal service unbundling pilot, continuing to tackle cybercrime and confirming its commitment to considering environmental and climate issues through its work.

Issue: 7954 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Cyber
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll