header-logo header-logo

27 October 2021
Issue: 7954 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Cyber
printer mail-detail

Affirmative cyber cover

An extra clause addressing affirmative cyber cover is to be added to the minimum terms and conditions for professional indemnity insurance, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has announced

The clause has been submitted to the Legal Services Board for final approval. If agreed, it will be in place for insurance renewals from early 2022 onwards.

It means insurance policies will explicitly state whether cover for cybercrime is available and specify what losses fall within scope for a potential claim. The cover is for client and third-party protection.

Losses to the law firm (first-party losses) are not covered, except for certain costs of investigating and defending a claim. However, firms can purchase a separate cyber policy for other risks.

Paul Philip, SRA chief executive, said: ‘Law firms handle large amounts of client money and sensitive information, and that makes them an attractive target to cybercriminals.

‘The clause on cyber losses provides real clarity for consumers, law firms and insurers about client and third-party protection in the event of cyber-attack, without changing the amount of cover specified by the minimum terms and conditions.’

The SRA published its 2021-22 business plan last week, following a consultation exercise in which more than 8,000 people voiced their opinions. Key areas of work for the SRA in the coming year, starting in November, include delivering the new Solicitors Qualifying Examination, building partnerships in lawtech, increasing its focus on anti-money laundering, developing its presence in Wales, and researching factors underpinning the attainment gap and over-representation of black and ethnic minority solicitors within enforcement processes.

Responding to feedback to its consultation, the SRA has also added: explaining its approach to assuring advocacy standards, capturing information on its legal service unbundling pilot, continuing to tackle cybercrime and confirming its commitment to considering environmental and climate issues through its work.

Issue: 7954 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Cyber
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
In this week’s NLJ, Fred Philpott, Gough Square Chambers, invites us to imagine there was no statutory limitation. What would that world be like?
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
back-to-top-scroll