header-logo header-logo

Affirmative cyber cover

27 October 2021
Issue: 7954 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Cyber
printer mail-detail
An extra clause addressing affirmative cyber cover is to be added to the minimum terms and conditions for professional indemnity insurance, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has announced

The clause has been submitted to the Legal Services Board for final approval. If agreed, it will be in place for insurance renewals from early 2022 onwards.

It means insurance policies will explicitly state whether cover for cybercrime is available and specify what losses fall within scope for a potential claim. The cover is for client and third-party protection.

Losses to the law firm (first-party losses) are not covered, except for certain costs of investigating and defending a claim. However, firms can purchase a separate cyber policy for other risks.

Paul Philip, SRA chief executive, said: ‘Law firms handle large amounts of client money and sensitive information, and that makes them an attractive target to cybercriminals.

‘The clause on cyber losses provides real clarity for consumers, law firms and insurers about client and third-party protection in the event of cyber-attack, without changing the amount of cover specified by the minimum terms and conditions.’

The SRA published its 2021-22 business plan last week, following a consultation exercise in which more than 8,000 people voiced their opinions. Key areas of work for the SRA in the coming year, starting in November, include delivering the new Solicitors Qualifying Examination, building partnerships in lawtech, increasing its focus on anti-money laundering, developing its presence in Wales, and researching factors underpinning the attainment gap and over-representation of black and ethnic minority solicitors within enforcement processes.

Responding to feedback to its consultation, the SRA has also added: explaining its approach to assuring advocacy standards, capturing information on its legal service unbundling pilot, continuing to tackle cybercrime and confirming its commitment to considering environmental and climate issues through its work.

Issue: 7954 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Cyber
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll