header-logo header-logo

01 October 2020 / Veronica Cowan
Issue: 7904 / Categories: Features , Profession , Covid-19 , Damages
printer mail-detail

After lockdown—more virtual law firms?

28452
Veronica Cowan scans the future for signs remote working is here to stay

In brief

  • Considers the prospects of lawyers, particularly those working in conveyancing, embracing remote working on a permanent basis.

While virtual law firms have existed for a while, they have been primarily in the corporate sector where lawyers are more accustomed to conducting business online. However, the pandemic has cast the ‘virtual net’ more widely, and one area of law which lends itself more easily than most to flexible working is conveyancing. Secure cloud technology and networking make it less important where work is done. The growth in Fibre coverage, which will speed up home broadband enormously, together with the use of virtual private networks for security, enhance safety and speed, which might encourage law firms to allow more staff to work remotely, and to furnish them with the technology to do so efficiently.

Indeed, might their clients be ahead of them in wanting the speed and convenience it could bring? Richard Birks, real estate partner

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll