header-logo header-logo

After the referendum

02 October 2014 / Marc Weller
Issue: 7624 / Categories: Opinion , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
cover_weller

Marc Weller discusses implementing the pledge for extensive new powers for Scotland

Two days before the Scottish referendum, the leaders of the Conservatives, Labour and Liberal Democrats signed the pledge. In a declaration published on the front page of the Scottish Daily Record , David Cameron, Ed Miliband and Nick Clegg vowed to devolve significantly more powers to Scotland should the “No” campaign win the referendum.

Now, after the clear defeat of proposed independence, the question is what the pledge actually entails. It was made hastily, when polls suggested in the final days before the ballot that “Yes” was in the ascendency. As with any wedding, it is only sometime after the marriage ceremony that the full meaning of the vows exchanged becomes apparent to the principals. Except, in this instance, there is no time to let the realisation of continuous union sink in and start considering the terms governing the common future with due deliberation.

The pledge was short on substantive details, but extraordinarily clear on the process. There is to be a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—Michael Conway

Birketts—Michael Conway

IP partner joins team in Bristol to lead branding and trade marks practice

Blake Morgan—Daniel Church

Blake Morgan—Daniel Church

Succession and tax team welcomes partner inLondon

Maguire Family Law—Jennifer Hudec

Maguire Family Law—Jennifer Hudec

Firm appoints senior associate to lead Manchester city centre team

NEWS
Ministers’ proposals to raise funds by seizing interest on lawyers’ client account schemes could ‘cause firms to close’, solicitors have warned
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
Pension sharing orders (PSOs) have quietly reached their 25th anniversary, yet remain stubbornly underused. Writing in NLJ this week, Joanna Newton of Stowe Family Law argues that this neglect risks long-term financial harm, particularly for women
A school ski trip, a confiscated phone and an unauthorised hotel-room entry culminated in a pupil’s permanent exclusion. In this week's issue of NLJ, Nicholas Dobson charts how the Court of Appeal upheld the decision despite acknowledged procedural flaws
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
back-to-top-scroll