header-logo header-logo

25 June 2009 / Alistair Kelman
Issue: 7375 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Against Intellectual Monopoly

Against Intellectual Monopoly: Michele Boldrin and David K. Levine

Thirty years ago the ordinary lawyer did not need to know about copyright save perhaps in the trite phrase “Copyright protects the form in which an idea is presented but not the idea itself”. Copyright issues were left to a specialist IP Bar of which I was then a member. Today copyright issues arise in the day to day work of a commercial solicitor. But while there are balanced practitioners textbook for every other field the main practitioners textbooks (Copinger & Skone James on Copyright   ISBN: 9781847031280 and The Modern law of Copyright and Designs ISBN: 9781405717984) both fail to genuinely set out the law and the intellectual arguments in a comprehensive and sensible form.  Written by practitioners in specialist IP chambers they are a history of the world written by the victors.
Partly this is a consequence of the English legal systems’ requirement that the loser pays the other side’s costs—so English judges never have the benefit of any amicus curiae briefs to assist the court

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll