header-logo header-logo

19 July 2018 / Constance McDonnell KC
Issue: 7802 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Against their will?

nlj_7802_mcdonnell

Constance McDonnell uncovers a surprising scenario in the area of probate law

  • A will is by operation of law revoked by the testator’s marriage (notwithstanding that one of the spouses lacked capacity to marry or was coerced into marrying).

It may come as a surprise to many practitioners that a will is by operation of law revoked by the testator’s marriage notwithstanding that one of the spouses lacked capacity to marry or was coerced into marrying. This bizarre lacuna in the law merits some attention in Parliament, particularly given the efforts being made generally by state bodies, lawyers and charities to safeguard the interests of vulnerable persons of all ages.

This issue was considered by the Court of Appeal in 1978 in Re Roberts deceased [1978] 1 WLR 653, [1978] 3 All ER 225. In that case a widow was seeking a grant of administration of an estate on the footing of an intestacy. The deceased was said to have been subnormal intellectually and also to have suffered from senile dementia at

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll