header-logo header-logo

22 July 2016
Issue: 7708 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Agriculture

R (on the application of T and S King (a partnership)) v Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs [2016] EWHC 1692 (Admin), [2016] All ER (D) 55 (Jul)

The Administrative Court allowed a judicial review challenge against the defendant Secretary of State’s decision that the claimant farming partnership had not been entitled to transfer entitlements under the single payment scheme of support to farmers. The arrangements that the partnership had entered into prior to the transfer, which had involved entering into a ten day a year lease of farm land following sale of the partnership’s land, had, on their face, fallen within Art 35 of Council Regulation (EC) 73/2009 as having been artificial, but, in context, had not been contrary to the objective of the scheme pursuant to Art 30.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Switalskis—Sally Ann Masih, Suzy Overton & Jane Beaumont

Switalskis—Sally Ann Masih, Suzy Overton & Jane Beaumont

Trio of recruits strengthens Switalskis residential property team

Ward Hadaway—Steven Hayward

Ward Hadaway—Steven Hayward

Birmingham law firm appoints construction partner

Flint Bishop—six appointments

Flint Bishop—six appointments

Flint Bishop accelerates Northern growth through strategic senior appointments

NEWS
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience

A longer time limit for employment tribunal claims, new charity law thresholds, property tribunal recruitment and appellate guidance on small-claims costs feature in the latest Civil Way round-up

A recent High Court ruling could make issue estoppel considerably more complex in cross-border litigation, requiring parties to consider the foreign law governing the underlying claim
The Supreme Court has overturned Cheshire West’s bright-line test for deprivation of liberty, replacing it with a broader, more contextual assessment that gives greater weight to an individual’s wishes, feelings and apparent consent
Jonathan Fisher KC’s wide-ranging fraud report contains worthwhile proposals, but turning them into workable reform will require money, capacity and political will
back-to-top-scroll