© Shutterstock
As calls for regulation grow, the UK’s artificial intelligence rulebook remains a work in progress, write Nick Smallwood & Paul Knight
When riding a runaway train, presumably the protocol is to look down the track in terror. Perhaps we should be relieved, then, that leading industry figures have recently called for a pause on the development of frontier artificial intelligence (AI) models.
While Amodei, Altman & co are considering where the AI locomotive ought to go next (and whether to install some brakes), now seems as good a time as any to reflect on the UK’s evolving approach to AI regulation.
Does the UK need an AI Bill?
A Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) report published last month recommended that the government introduce a new AI Bill in order to:
- Classify AI systems into different risk levels, and mandate proportionately more demanding obligations for higher-risk AI systems and AI models.
- Impose proportionate obligations on actors at all stages of the AI lifecycle and supply chains
-maryam-naaz-theo-corbett-and-rachel-carter-with-(front-from-left)-arya-vindlacheruvu-and-jessica-ashcroft.tmb-mov69x69.jpg?sfvrsn=47f89300_1)
