header-logo header-logo

Aircraft

21 October 2010
Issue: 7438 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Pindell Ltd and another v Airasia Berhad [2010] EWHC 2516 (Comm), [2010] All ER (D) 133 (Oct)

Late return of an aircraft under an aircraft operating lease could be distinguished from late return of a vessel under a time-charter for a vessel. A ship was very different in nature from an aircraft. It was obvious that the latter was far more vulnerable to a technical problem which would render it wholly, if temporarily, unusable. Ships did sufferer major engine breakdown, but the range of problems having a similarly paralysing effect was obviously far smaller than in the case of an aircraft. Secondly, an aircraft operating lease was significantly different in character from a time chart party. Under a time charter, the owner retained possession of the ship and was responsible for its maintenance and for its crewing and navigation. Under an operating lease, the position was very different. The lessee took possession of the aircraft and became responsible for its maintenance and insurance. After delivery of the aircraft, engines and every part were at the sole risk of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Leeds office strengthened with triple partner hire

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Corporate lawyer joins as partner in London office

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll