header-logo header-logo

01 July 2010
Issue: 7424 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

Al Rawi v Security Service

In Al Rawi v Security Service [2010] EWCA Civ 482, [2010] All ER (D) 03 (May) the court considered a preliminary issue in a suit brought by six former detainees against several arms of the UK government.

The claimants brought the action under a number of heads in tort and for breach of statutory duty, alleging that the defendants had contributed to the claimants’ detention, rendition and alleged mistreatment while detained.

Open v closed

The defendants sought to file what was termed an “open defence”. This document omitted materials upon which the defendants sought to rely but which they claimed would cause real harm to the public interest if disclosed. This was construed by the court as a request to run all aspects of the case (the pleadings, disclosure, hearings and so on) with parallel “open” and “closed” elements. A process of this kind is not unfamiliar to the courts, and is commonly referred to as the closed material procedure.

The closed material

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Trowers & Hamlins—Paul Batchelor

Trowers & Hamlins—Paul Batchelor

Trowers Hamlins strengthens Birmingham Office with senior corporate partner hire

Birketts—trainee appointments

Birketts—trainee appointments

Birketts welcomes largest ever Trainee Solicitor cohort for 2026

Sidley—James Sherlock

Sidley—James Sherlock

Sidley Expands Private Equity Practice With James Sherlock in London

NEWS
Developers in areas with poorly performing councils can apply directly to the Planning Inspectorate for permission under section 62A of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
A divorced woman has secured funding to participate in her former husband’s inquest after the Legal Aid Agency reconsidered repeated refusals
The Thirlwall Inquiry has exposed a ‘complete failure’ to protect babies at the Countess of Chester Hospital, but its recommendations must now be put into practice
MPs cannot simply resign their Commons seats. Instead, they take a nominal Crown office, usually the Chiltern Hundreds or Manor of Northstead, which disqualifies them from sitting
More than 500 former rugby players can pursue brain injury claims despite serious failures to disclose documents ordered by the High Court
back-to-top-scroll