header-logo header-logo

01 July 2010
Issue: 7424 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

Al Rawi v Security Service

In Al Rawi v Security Service [2010] EWCA Civ 482, [2010] All ER (D) 03 (May) the court considered a preliminary issue in a suit brought by six former detainees against several arms of the UK government.

The claimants brought the action under a number of heads in tort and for breach of statutory duty, alleging that the defendants had contributed to the claimants’ detention, rendition and alleged mistreatment while detained.

Open v closed

The defendants sought to file what was termed an “open defence”. This document omitted materials upon which the defendants sought to rely but which they claimed would cause real harm to the public interest if disclosed. This was construed by the court as a request to run all aspects of the case (the pleadings, disclosure, hearings and so on) with parallel “open” and “closed” elements. A process of this kind is not unfamiliar to the courts, and is commonly referred to as the closed material procedure.

The closed material

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Global finance group strengthened by returning partner in London

NEWS
The controversial Courts and Tribunals Bill has passed its second reading by 304 votes to 203, despite concerted opposition from the legal profession
The presumption of parental involvement is to be abolished, the Lord Chancellor David Lammy has confirmed
A highly experienced chartered legal executive has been prevented from representing her client in financial remedies proceedings, in a case that highlights the continued fallout from Mazur
Plans to commandeer 50%-75% of the interest on lawyers’ client accounts to fund the justice system overlook the cost and administrative burden of this on small and medium law firms, CILEX has warned
Lawyers have been asked for their views on proposals to change the penalties for assaulting a police officer
back-to-top-scroll