header-logo header-logo

All change

02 June 2011 / Katherine Rees
Issue: 7468 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail
gettyimages_90579995_4

Katherine Rees evaluates the impact of the SRA’s financial protection policy statement

IN BRIEF

  • Changes to the Assigned Risks Pool.
  • What solicitors can expect in the short term.
  • Fundamental review of conveyancing process.

October 2011 promises to be a time of change for the regulation of solicitors. On 6 October the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) will publish its handbook, which sets out the regulatory requirements for law firms and alternative business structures (ABSs) and the brave new world of outcomes focused regulation. ABSs are due to enter the legal services market at the same time. Solicitors must also renew their insurance cover on 1 October.

The SRA has recently announced changes to the way such insurance will operate in future. On 13 April it published its financial protection policy statement, which sets out the changes it intends to implement to the compulsory insurance arrangements for the profession and identifies other areas which have been earmarked for review and consultation.

This article looks briefly at the background to the changes and summarises the differences

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll