header-logo header-logo

02 June 2011 / Katherine Rees
Issue: 7468 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

All change

gettyimages_90579995_4

Katherine Rees evaluates the impact of the SRA’s financial protection policy statement

IN BRIEF

  • Changes to the Assigned Risks Pool.
  • What solicitors can expect in the short term.
  • Fundamental review of conveyancing process.

October 2011 promises to be a time of change for the regulation of solicitors. On 6 October the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) will publish its handbook, which sets out the regulatory requirements for law firms and alternative business structures (ABSs) and the brave new world of outcomes focused regulation. ABSs are due to enter the legal services market at the same time. Solicitors must also renew their insurance cover on 1 October.

The SRA has recently announced changes to the way such insurance will operate in future. On 13 April it published its financial protection policy statement, which sets out the changes it intends to implement to the compulsory insurance arrangements for the profession and identifies other areas which have been earmarked for review and consultation.

This article looks briefly at the background to the changes and summarises the differences

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll