header-logo header-logo

06 October 2011 / Janna Purdie , Ruth Pratt
Issue: 7484 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , LexisPSL , CPR
printer mail-detail

All change

Ruth Pratt & Janna Purdie provide an update on the recent changes to the civil procedure rules

The routine civil procedure rules (CPR) updates which generally take place in October have, this year, been spread over the period of two months from 1 August to 1 October. The updates range from amendments to CPR rules and practice directions through to new practice directions. The changes cover a diverse range of issues and the following provides a brief overview of the areas subject to change. If practising in any of these areas it is important to make sure that you consider the issues in more depth and are aware of the impact the changes will have on the work you undertake.

Changes effective from August 2011

A new practice direction, CPR PD 51F came into force on 1 August, launching a pilot scheme which is due to operate until 31 July 2012. The scheme has been set up to collate data on the number and types of non-disclosure injunctions (aka “privacy”

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll