header-logo header-logo

15 September 2017 / Philip Evans KC , Tom Orpin-Massey
Issue: 7761 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

All change for commercial gambling?

Philip Evans QC & Tom Orpin-Massey cast an eye over the Gambling Commission’s new enforcement suite

  • How might the changes to the Gambling Commission’s key enforcement policy documents affect licensees?

The Gambling Commission published its new suite of enforcement policy documents on 5 July 2017. The changes represent arguably the biggest shift in regulatory emphasis since the commission was established in 2007.

Gone is the written presumption in favour of voluntary settlements between an operator and the commission. Instead the commission will put all its regulatory tools on an equal footing, and among those tools are formal licence reviews and financial penalties.

A further sea-change is a new focus on the consumer : their needs, expectations, and gambling experience. Sarah Harrison, chief executive of the commission, is a former managing director at OFGEM, the gas and electricity regulator, and has clearly imported this consumer-centric approach. This may have a profound effect on the way the commission regulates.

The new enforcement suite

The commission’s new enforcement approach is set out in four key policy

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

19 promotions across national offices, including two new partners

Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

Partner promoted to head of corporate team

Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

Chester office expansion accelerates with triple appointment

NEWS
As AI chatbots increasingly provide legal and commercial advice, English law is beginning to confront who should bear responsibility when automated systems get things wrong
Businesses are facing a ‘dramatic rise in prosecution risks’ as sweeping reforms to corporate criminal liability come into force, expanding the net of who can be held responsible for wrongdoing inside organisations
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has reignited debate over what exactly counts as the ‘conduct of litigation’ in modern legal practice
A controversial High Court financial remedies ruling has reignited debate over secrecy, non-disclosure and fairness in divorce proceedings involving hidden wealth
Britain’s deferred prosecution agreement regime is undergoing a significant shift, with prosecutors placing renewed emphasis on corporate cooperation, reform and early self-reporting
back-to-top-scroll